The software's Swiss Army knife approach helps companies create more useful intranets, set up document sharing, offer blogs and wikis, and build a richer online company directory. This boundary-blurring nature is part of its appeal..
J. Nicholas Hoover, the author of the article could be describing Domino but no, it's Sharepoint.
While IT manages master page layouts, business units can build one-off sites without IT's help. "This is why SharePoint has taken off like wildfire
General Mills Manager of .NET
So how do we counter this? What can we do? What should Lotus do?
Sharepoint is already under the covers, maybe even paid for in licensing, so why not use it? Sound familiar? It should, Lotus asks the same question, and has for years.
When you put Domino into your organization, you had, from early on, the capability to do so much more, but few understood it all or do today. The discussion databases that predate wiki's, the Team Room's that predate most collaboration software in the market, plus a built in messaging system and strong server options all provides a great package.
Now it looks like companies want to go modular. Server for this, a server for that.
Doesn't this go against the thinking of modern times?
Less power consumption, fewer servers, reduced carbon footprint, fewer Administrators, reduced expenses?
And now The Cloud hovers ever closer and may provide the myth of all the above.
You as a customer will experience all the benefits just listed, yet your provider/host of Cloud Computing just took it all on.
How are they doing with it? What are they doing to minimize it?
Does this interest you? Will it make any difference for you to go with IBM, Amazon or anyone else?