tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8994561579739999989.post7375553735405736190..comments2024-02-28T10:15:50.335+02:00Comments on Lotus Evangelist: Google+, Cure for What Ails FB?Keith Brookshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11107190540208956954noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8994561579739999989.post-28116965003153960472011-07-13T17:54:51.957+03:002011-07-13T17:54:51.957+03:00@Anon, I beg to differ than there is no difference...@Anon, I beg to differ than there is no differences.<br />Perhaps because I am not and never was a fan of FB that I am less familiar with where these things sit. The ability to only see certain people's inputs is a main draw to G+ over FB.<br />Not saying it is genius and the end all be all but it is a different feel to it. My experience with Novell's Vibe which is similar to G+ also shows different views.<br />One problem has been Twitter is limited to 140 characters and this stops that problem AND makes FB things I and others prefer to use, the focus, instead of stupid games and other useless items.Keith Brookshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11107190540208956954noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8994561579739999989.post-57538875485116258442011-07-13T17:19:22.100+03:002011-07-13T17:19:22.100+03:00I am probably seeing the emperors new clothes (or ...I am probably seeing the emperors new clothes (or lack there of). <br /><br />Functionally the only difference between FB and G+ is that FB has horrible spammy apps and hides your ability to privacy. <br /><br />Other then that, FB can already do functionally what G+ does, but uses a different UI experience in which to do it. <br /><br />I don't like FB, and G+ is certainly has a better user experience, but nothing ground breaking that I can see yet.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com